Press "Enter" to skip to content

When The Money Laundering Bridge Crossed Itself: The Rivera Verdict, The ActBlue Boston Filing, And The 23-Year Continuing Enterprise

An analytical examination of why the legal frame governing the documentary record changed on May 1, 2026, and what the post-verdict numbers actually look like.

Two Filings, One Day

By Chris Gleason

On May 1, 2026, two federal court events happened that the press has not yet connected.

In Miami, a federal jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida returned a verdict in United States v. Rivera and Nuhfer, Case No. 1:22-cr-20552, before Judge Melissa Damian. Both defendants were convicted on all counts: conspiracy to violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act under 18 U.S.C. 371, substantive FARA violations under 22 U.S.C. 612 and 618, conspiracy to commit money laundering under 18 U.S.C. 1956(h), and four substantive counts of engaging in monetary transactions in criminally derived property under 18 U.S.C. 1957. David Rivera, a former United States Representative from Florida’s 25th Congressional District, was remanded into federal custody as a flight risk pending sentencing. Forfeiture exposure on the convicted counts is approximately $20 million on a $50 million PDV USA contract that the government proved was sourced to the Venezuelan government through layered intermediary entities.

The same day, in Boston, ActBlue LLC and three affiliated entities filed a 41-page First Amendment retaliation complaint against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned ActBlue LLC et al. v. Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr., Case No. 1:26-cv-11986-RGS. The complaint alleges that Paxton’s investigative demands, his April 20, 2026 Tarrant County civil enforcement action under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and his accompanying public statements violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments because they constitute retaliation against ActBlue for facilitating donations to Democratic candidates and progressive causes.

These two events share more than calendar coincidence. They share an analytical center. Both arise from foreign-source or otherwise tainted money flowing through intermediary entities into United States political channels. One has just been adjudicated by a federal jury. The other is a defensive holding action filed against the prospect of similar adjudication.

Read Full Article Here…| Miami Independent


Home | Caravan to Midnight

We Need Your Help To Keep Caravan To Midnight Going,

Please Consider Donating To Help Keep Independent Media Independent

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Breaking News: